Invention & Design:
Students to Inventors: References

References and Suggestions for Further Reading

Abra, J. (1994). Collaboration in creative work: An initiative for investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 1-20.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14-23.

Archambault, F. X., Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C. L., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers [Research monograph 93101]. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Arneson, P., & Hoff, N. (1992). Cooperative learning for the gifted student: Contributions from speech communication. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 353 620).

Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363-423.

Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1989). Thinking and doing at Menlo Park: Edison's development of the telephone, 1876-1878. In W. Pretzer (Ed.), Thomas Edison's Menlo Park Laboratory. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Carlson, W. B., & Gorman, M. E. (1992). A cognitive framework to understand technological creativity: Bell, Edison, and the telephone. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 48-79). New York: Oxford University Press.

Chou, D.-L., & Calkins, D. E. (Eds.). (1994). ECSEL: Introduction to design engineering active learning modules: A catalogue. Department of Mechanical Engineering, FU-10 University of Washington: Copy Services, University of Washington, DS-12 B-042 Communications Bldg.Seattle, WA 98195.

Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1991). Unfair expectations: A pilot study of middle school students' comparisons of gifted and regular classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 56-63.

Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa Inventiveness Inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157-163.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dasgupta, S. (1994). Computational and cognitive explorations of technological originality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fitzgerald, N. (1995, March). Teaching with cases. Prism, 16-20.

Friedel, R. (1994). Zipper: An exploration in novelty. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Gallagher, J., Coleman, M. R., & Nelson, S. (1993). Cooperative learning as perceived by educators of gifted students and proponents of cooperative education. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program, University of North Carolina. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 355 675)

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

Gilmore, F. E. (1959). How to invent. Houston: Gulf Publishing.

Gonick, L., & Huffman, A. (1991). The cartoon guide to physics. NY: Harper Perennial.

Gorman, M. E., & Carlson, W. B. (1990). Interpreting invention as a cognitive process: The case of Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison and the telephone. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 131-164.

Gorman, M. E., Mehalik, M. M., Carlson, W. B., & Oblon, M. (1993). Alexander Graham Bell, Elisha Gray and the speaking telegraph: A cognitive comparison. History of Technology, 15, 1-56.

Gorman, M. E., & Plucker, J. A. (in press). Teaching invention as critical creative processes: A course on technoscientific creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Gorman, M. E., Richards, L. G., Scherer, W. T., & Kagiwada, J. K. (1995). Teaching invention and design: Multi-disciplinary learning modules. Journal of Engineering Education.

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 11-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hooper, S., Ward, T. J., Hannafin, M. J., & Clark, H. T., III. (1989). The effects of aptitude composition on achievement during small group learning. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 102-109.

Hounshell, D. A. (1992). Invention in the industrial research laboratory: Individual act or collective process? In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 273-290). New York: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. T. (1993). Gifted students illustrate what isn't cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 60-61.

Kanevsky, L. (1985). Computer-based math for gifted students: Comparison of cooperative and competitive strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8, 239-255.

Kuehn, C. (1988). Inventing: Creative sciencing. Childhood Education, 64, 5-7.

Kuehn, C., & Krockover, G. H. (1986). An analysis of fifth- and sixth-grade students' acquisition of the inventing process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco. (ERIC No. ED 276 618)

Li, A. K. F., & Adamson, G. (1992). Gifted secondary students' preferred learning style: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 46-54.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Matthews, M. (1992). Gifted students talk about cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(2), 48-50.

Matthews, M. (1993). Meaningful cooperative learning is key. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 64.

McCormick, A. J. (1984). Teaching inventiveness. Childhood Education, 60, 249-255.

Myers, M. R., Slavin, M. J., & Southern, W. T. (1990). Emergence and maintenance of leadership among gifted students in group problem solving. Roeper Review, 12, 256-260.

National Research Council. (1991). Improving engineering design: Designing for competitive edge. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Necka, E. (1992). Creativity training. Kraków, Poland: TAiWPN "UNIVERSITAS."

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Plucker, J. (1994). Reconceptualizing creativity education. Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 8(1), 7-12. (Available from Gifted Education Press, P.O. Box 1586, Manassas, VA 22110)

Plucker, J. A., & Gorman, M. E. (1994). An evaluation of a course on invention and design for gifted high school students. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia School of Engineering. (Available from the Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation)

Richards, L. G., Gorman, M. E., Kagiwada, J., Scherer, W. T., & Cline, A. (1994). Teaching invention and design. In 1994 Annual Conference Proceedings: American Association for Engineering Education, Vol. I (pp. 192-197). Washington, DC: ASEE.

Robinson, A. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9-27.

Robinson, A. (1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented student. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut.

Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40 - 76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.

Sapon-Shevin, M., & Schniedewind, N. (1993). Why (even) gifted children need cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 62-63.

Schlesinger, B. E., Jr. (1987a). How to invent: A text for teachers and students. New York: IFI/Plenum.

Schlesinger, B. E., Jr. (1987b). Teaching problem solving through invention. Vocational Education Journal, 62(5), 36-37.

Sizer, T. R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Slavin, R. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3-8.

Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stein, M. I. (1974). Stimulating creativity. Vol. 1. Individual procedures. New York: Academic Press.

Stein, M. I. (1975). Stimulating creativity. Vol. 2. Group procedures. New York: Academic Press.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Thinking styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 366-371.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1993). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 122-130.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (1994). Planning effective evaluations for programs for the gifted. Roeper Review, 17, 46-51.

Treffinger, D. J. (1989). Student invention evaluation kit: Field test edition. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.

Weber, R. J., & Perkins, D. N. (Eds.). (1992). Inventive minds: Creativity in technology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Westberg, K. L. (1991). The effects of instruction in the inventing process on students' development of inventions. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51. (University Microfilms No. 9107625)

Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120-146.

Wiener, N. (1993). Invention: The care and feeding of ideas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Williams, W. M., & Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Group intelligence: Why some groups are better than others. Intelligence, 12, 351-377.

Willings, D. (1983). Group roles and the gifted child. Roeper Review, 5(3), 18-21.