|
Salem Witch Trials in History and Literature
An Undergraduate Course, University of Virginia
Spring Semester 2001
Considering the assumption that witchcraft was hereditary, Mary (Towne)
Easty was certain to be accused of witchcraft after her sister, Rebecca
(Towne) Nurse, was condemned for her unwavering appeal of innocence.
Mary Easty was not a member of Salem Town or Village, but a resident
of Topsfield, a settlement just north of the Village. Animosity had
festered between members of Salem Village and Topsfield since 1639 when
the General Court of Massachusetts granted Salem permission to expand
northward in the direction of the Ipswich River, but then only four
years later the same court authorized inhabitants of another Village,
Ipswich, to found a settlement there. As land became scarcer, quarrels
regarding boundaries between the settlement to become known as Topsfield
and Salem went on for a century. The Putnams of Salem Village embodied
this battle in their quarrels with the Nurse family, Mary Easty's brother-in-law.
According to Boyer and Nissenbaum in Salem Possessed, considering
the bitterness between these families, it can be seen as no coincidence
that the three Towne sisters, Rebecca Nurse, Sarah Cloyce and Mary Easty,
were all daughters and wives of Topsfield men eventually to be persecuted
by Putnam women in 1692 on behalf of Putnam men.
More interesting than the accusations against Easty is her experience
during the trials. She was accused on April 21, examined on the 22nd,
and imprisoned after denying her guilt. During her examination, Magistrate
John Hathorne aggressively questioned Easty, or more accurately, tried
to lead her to a confession by the following line of questioning:
"How can you say you know nothing when you see these tormented [girls],
& accuse you that you know nothing?" "Would you have me accuse myself?"
"Yes if you be guilty."
"Sir, I never complied but prayed against [the devil] all my dayes...
I will say it, if it was my last time, I am clear of this sin." (SWPI
120)
In a surprising moment, Hathorne, clearly affected by the convincing
manner with which Easty spoke, turned to the accusers and asked, "Are
you certain this is the woman?" This question acted as a symbol for
the accusers to release their full energy into tormented fits. Hathorne
was now convinced and imprisoned Easty. The girls, however, seemed not
to be fully convinced of their own accusations. Perhaps due to pressure
from community around Easty, all of the accusers, except Mercy Lewis,
began to back off their claims and Easty was released from jail on May
18.
The details of what happened next provide undeniable clues about the
power of the accusers and the impossibility of conducting a fair juridical
process. After Easty's release, Mercy Lewis fell into violent fits and
appeared to be approaching death. Mercy Lewis later explained that Easty
was tormenting her, and "said [Easty] would kill [Lewis] before midnight
because she did not cleare hir so as the Rest did." (Salem Witchcraft
Papers, I: 124) Mary Walcott, Abigail Williams and Ann Putnam were brought
to her bedside in an effort to discover who was tormenting Mercy. Along
the path to the Mercy's house, Ann and Abigail explained that they saw
Easty's specter tormenting Mercy, strongly suggesting a collaboration
effort had already taken place before Mercy began her torments. Frances
Hill in A Delusion of Satan calls this episode a propaganda scheme
to show doubting Villagers the dire consequences of freeing witches
from jail. Mercy and four others cried out against Easty on May 20.
Mercy's fits did not cease until Easty was back in prison in irons demonstrating
the effective power of the accusers.
While Easty remained in jail awaiting her September 9 trial, she and
her sister, Sarah Cloyce, composed a petition to the magistrates in
which they asked, in essence, for a fair trial. They complained that
they were "neither able to plead our owne cause, nor is councell allowed."
They suggested that the judges ought to serve as their counsel and that
they be allowed persons to testify on their behalf. Easty hoped her
good reputation in Topsfield and the words of her minister might aid
her case in Salem, a town of strangers. Lastly, the sisters asked that
the testimony of accusers and other "witches" be dismissed considering
it was predominantly spectral evidence that lacked legality. (Salem
Witchcraft Papers, I: 303) The sisters hoped that the judges would be
forced to weigh solid character testimony against ambiguous spectral
evidence. The petition did not change the outcome of Easty's trial,
for she was condemned to hang on September 17th. But together with her
second petition, Easty had forced the court to consider its flaws.
Easty's second petition was written not as a last attempt to save her
own life but as a plea that "no more innocent blood may be shed." (SWP
I :304) She concedes saying that the court had the best of intentions,
but only more innocent deaths would occur if the court continued its
practices, for she like many others could not "belie [their] own soul."
She proposes two strategies for the court in to use when determining
witchcraft: First, she asks that the accusers be kept apart to see if
under such circumstances they would all tell the same experiences. If
they were able to give similar credible accounts of their spectral experiences
then any doubt would be removed as to the guilt or innocence of the
person on trial. This proposal brings to mind Thomas Brattle's observation
in his famous Letter of October 8, 1692 that the accusers, when
not claiming to be attacked by specters, were otherwise in good health.
Easty was obviously not the only skeptic of the accusers' spectral torments.
Secondly, Easty proposed that all confessing witches be brought to trial
as well as those confessing innocence. Rosenthal writes in A Salem
Story that in an atmosphere of rising doubt, "for the court to ignore
Easty's challenge would be to acknowledge to the critics that the proceedings
were fatally flawed - that the hunt was not really for witches after
all but for validating the court."
Easty was hanged on September 22, 1692. Her demeanor at Gallows Hill
is documented by Calef: "when she took her last farewell of her husband,
children and friends, was, as is reported by them present, as serious,
religious, distinct, and affectionate as could well be exprest, drawing
tears from the eyes of almost all present." Easty challenged the court
to no personal avail, but she exposed the weakness of the court for
the benefit of others.
|
|
Bibliography
Boyer and Nissenbaum. Salem Possessed
Calef, Robert. More Wonders of the Invisible World.
Hill, Francis. A Delusion of Satan: the Full Story of the Salem
Witch Trials
Miller, Perry. "The New England Mind, From Colony to Province.
Rosenthal, Bernard, Salem Story; Reading the Witch Trials of 1692.
Boyer & Nissenbaum, eds., Salem Witchcraft Papers, Volume I
Starkey, Marion. The Devil in Massachusetts, A Modern Inquiry into
the Salem Witch Trials.
Upham, Charles. Salem Witchcraft;.
|