|
|
|
Appendix II. Eclipses in the Reign of Emperor
Chao
i. HS 7: 3b reads, in the
period Shih-Yüan, "the third year, . . . . xi, (the eleventh month), on [the
day] jen-ch'en, the first day of the month, there was an eclipse of the sun."
(Han-chi 16: 2a agrees.)
HS 27 Cb: 14b adds, "It was 9 degrees in
[the constellation] Tou."
P. Hoang lists this date as Dec. 3, 84 B.C.;
Oppolzer calculates his solar eclipse no. 2674 for that date. The principal
star of Tou, φ Sagittarii, was then in R.A. 249°. According to my
computation by Neugebauer's method, the sun was in long. 249° =
247° R.A. Oppolzer charts the path of totality as passing through
Indo-China; at Ch'ang-an the eclipse reached a magnitude of 0.66 (sun's
diameter = 1.00) at 11:25 a.m., local time.
In the five years between this and the last
recorded eclipse in the reign of Emperor Wu, no eclipses were visible in
China.
ii. HS 7: 6a reads, in the
period Yüan-feng, the first year, "vii, on yi-hai, the last day, there was an
eclipse of the sun, and it was total." (Han-chi 16: 6a agrees.)
HS 27 Cb: 14b writes the day as "chi-hai" and adds, "It
was almost total. It was 12 degrees in Chang. Liu Hsiang said, `Because it was
chi-hai it was total. The significance of [this combination] is great.' " Meng
K'ang (ca. 180-260) comments, "Chi is earth and
hai is water. It was the pure
[element of] yin, hence the eclipse was extremely great. When a solar eclipse
is complete, it is [called] chi 既."
The comments of Liu Hsiang and Meng K'ang fix the
day as chi-hai, not yi-hai
as in the text of the "Annals" and the Han-chi. The
latter's concurrence shows moreover that this error was ancient. yi-hai was
furthermore neither the last day of the month nor the day of the eclipse,
according to P. Hoang's calendar.
P. Hoang equates this date with Sept. 20, 80 B.C.;
Oppolzer calculates his solar eclipse no. 2684 for that date. The stars of
Chang, κ, ν, λ², μ, φ³ and Hydrae were then in 120°, 123°, 127°,
131°, and 135° respectively. The sun's longitude was 174°
= 175° R.A. This discrepancy of longitude is hard to account for.
Calculation shows that at Ch'ang-an, the eclipse reached only a magnitude of
0.77, which was at 12:53 p.m. local time. Calculation of the path of totality
shows that it passed through Lake Baikal, east of Urga, and that
at the present Peking the eclipse was total at 1:39 p.m. local time.
In the 4 years between this and the preceding
recorded eclipse, 2 solar eclipses were visible in China; on May 18, 82 B.C.
and May 6, 81 B.C. (the latter was invisible at Ch'ang-an, but calculation
shows that at the present Peiping it reached a magnitude of 0.47 at 5:03 a.m.,
shortly after sunrise).
|